Skip to main content
A/KAI Kills What?

Task // Human interaction

Low exposure · 3 occupations · 0 evidence

Negotiation

Reaching agreements between parties with competing interests.

Task automation exposure

25/100

Low exposure

Exposure basis

[v4/median] score 25 (raw 25 | A 25 / B 5 / C 25 | modality: other) AI can generate data‑driven proposals and simulate basic bargaining, but lacks the nuanced persuasion, trust‑building, and adaptive judgment needed for high‑stakes negotiations. (capable: GPT‑4 (large language model))

2 capabilities · 3 occupations

Basis

How exposure was assessed

[v4/median] score 25 (raw 25 | A 25 / B 5 / C 25 | modality: other) AI can generate data‑driven proposals and simulate basic bargaining, but lacks the nuanced persuasion, trust‑building, and adaptive judgment needed for high‑stakes negotiations. (capable: GPT‑4 (large language model))

Automation exposure25/100

How much of this task's output current AI can produce or substantially assist.

Strongest applicable capability62/100

Best current model strength on any capability this task requires.

This is an assessment of technical feasibility plus published evidence - not a forecast. Even fully automatable tasks are often not automated, because of cost, verification, liability, regulation or the fact that the task is bundled with other work.

Capabilities

AI capabilities involved

Occupations

Occupations that perform this task (3)

Importance is the O*NET-style weight of this task within each occupation. The same task can be highly exposed but peripheral to one job and core to another.

Occupations performing Negotiation, with task importance and exposure.
OccupationIndustryImportanceRoleOccupation AI exposure
Sales Representatives, Technical and Scientific ProductsSales & marketing5/5core38
Claims Adjusters, Examiners and InvestigatorsFinancial services3/5secondary34
Therapists and CounsellorsHealthcare2/5secondary35

Evidence

Evidence (0)

No evidence item is mapped to this specific task yet. The exposure figure above rests on the v1 editorial baseline and on the capability assessment, and should be treated as low-confidence. Pages with fewer than 0 evidence items are excluded from sitemaps.