insurance claims adjuster exposure decreased 8.0 points
AI Exposure Score moved from a previous calculation to 34/100 under methodology v1.0. 0 evidence item(s) contributed.
Category: Business & financial · Industry: Financial services
Low exposure
12 Oct 2026
19 hours ago · sources: BLS OES (approx) · O*NET
0 sources
5 core tasks shown · 1 secondary hidden
Claims Adjusters, Examiners and Investigators Lower exposure: only 2 of 5 core tasks show high task automation potential : exposure 34/100 (low exposure).
No model has published evidence mapped to this occupation yet - the score comes from generic task assessment.
Score breakdown
Every component is stored with the score row and can be recomputed from the evidence table.
Methodology 2026-09-a · score v1.0 · input hash 1d06560c76dcd67c
Strength of current models on the capabilities this job's tasks require.
Task-level exposure, weighted by task importance. A component of the headline, not the headline itself.
Evidence that AI is actually being used for this work.
Observed changes in postings, employment or earnings.
Quantity and source quality of the evidence behind the score.
0 evidence item(s) contribute. Calculated 19 hours ago. 12 Oct 2026 UTC.
Evaluates insurance claims. Damage estimation from photographs and policy matching are automated; fraud investigation and settlements are human.
Employment
≈300,000
approx. BLS OES
Median wage
≈$72,000
approx. BLS OES
Tasks tracked
6
linked to this occupation
Employment and wage values are approximate reference figures from the BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics programme, stored with an approximation flag. Verify against the O*NET record and BLS before quoting them.
Tasks
Core tasks only. Exposure describes how much of the task output current AI can produce or substantially assist - not whether the task disappears. Secondary shared-baseline edges are hidden until per-occupation curation is complete.
core task · importance 5/5 · best current capability 80/100
core task · importance 4/5 · best current capability 84/100
core task · importance 4/5 · best current capability 80/100
core task · importance 4/5 · best current capability 78/100
core task · importance 4/5 · best current capability 76/100
Evidence
0 attributed item(s). Confidence reflects study design: randomised and production deployments score higher than platform observations, which score higher than projections.
No occupation-specific evidence has been mapped yet. This occupation is scored from generic task assessment only - a genuinely weaker basis, and the reason its score is marked low-confidence.
Historical trend
Backcast series: recomputed at quarterly checkpoints using only the models and evidence published by each date.
Reconstruction, not measurement. 14 observed daily snapshot(s) exist for this occupation; the earlier part of the curve is derived by applying the current methodology to the model releases and published evidence available at each past date.
Recent events
AI Exposure Score moved from a previous calculation to 34/100 under methodology v1.0. 0 evidence item(s) contributed.
AI Exposure Score moved from a previous calculation to 42/100 under methodology v1.0. 0 evidence item(s) contributed.
Related
Office & administrative support · 28 tasks
Business & financial · 26 tasks
Business & financial · 30 tasks
Business & financial · 21 tasks