Skip to main content
A/KAI Kills What?

Dossier #81 // career autopsy

Lower exposure Low confidence

Human Resources Managers

Category: General · SOC 11-3121.00 · Industry: Cross-industry

AI Exposure

11/100
0.0

Very low exposure

Last updated

12 Oct 2026

18 hours ago · sources: BLS OES (approx) · O*NET

Evidence

0 sources

23 core tasks shown

Verdict

Human Resources Managers Lower exposure: only 6 of 23 core tasks show high task automation potential : exposure 11/100 (very low exposure).

No model has published evidence mapped to this occupation yet - the score comes from generic task assessment.

Share this verdict:

Score breakdown

Why this score?

Every component is stored with the score row and can be recomputed from the evidence table.

AI Exposure (composite)11/100

Methodology 2026-09-a · score v1.0 · input hash 75e6a8dbe92d2969

AI capability exposure0/100

Strength of current models on the capabilities this job's tasks require.

Task automation potential38/100

Task-level exposure, weighted by task importance. A component of the headline, not the headline itself.

Observed AI adoption0/100

Evidence that AI is actually being used for this work.

Labour-market signal0/100

Observed changes in postings, employment or earnings.

Evidence strength0/100

Quantity and source quality of the evidence behind the score.

0 evidence item(s) contribute. Calculated 18 hours ago. 12 Oct 2026 UTC.

Overview

Plan, direct, or coordinate human resources activities and staff of an organization.

Employment

-

approx. BLS OES

Median wage

-

approx. BLS OES

Tasks tracked

23

linked to this occupation

Employment and wage values are approximate reference figures from the BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics programme, stored with an approximation flag. Verify against the O*NET record and BLS before quoting them.

Tasks

Task-level automation exposure

Core tasks only. Exposure describes how much of the task output current AI can produce or substantially assist - not whether the task disappears. Secondary shared-baseline edges are hidden until per-occupation curation is complete.

Evidence

Evidence trail

0 attributed item(s). Confidence reflects study design: randomised and production deployments score higher than platform observations, which score higher than projections.

No occupation-specific evidence has been mapped yet. This occupation is scored from generic task assessment only - a genuinely weaker basis, and the reason its score is marked low-confidence.

Historical trend

Exposure over time

Backcast series: recomputed at quarterly checkpoints using only the models and evidence published by each date.

Human Resources Managers AI exposure backcast, quarterly from 2021Reconstructed exposure series with 9 checkpoints. Current value 11 out of 100. 9 observed snapshots recorded since tracking began.1000502026-10-042026-10-12111111
Score · 9 points · 2026-10-04 to 2026-10-12

Reconstruction, not measurement. 9 observed daily snapshot(s) exist for this occupation; the earlier part of the curve is derived by applying the current methodology to the model releases and published evidence available at each past date.

Recent events

Signals affecting this occupation

No events match this filter yet. New verified events appear here as analysis completes.

Related

Other occupations in this industry