Skip to main content
A/KAI Kills What?

Task // O*NET task

Very low exposure · 1 occupations · 0 evidence

Collaborate with other astronomers to carry out research projects.

Collaborate with other astronomers to carry out research projects.

Task automation exposure

22/100

Very low exposure

Exposure basis

[v4/median] score 22 (raw 22 | A 25 / B 22 / C 15 | modality: other) AI can assist with literature searches, data analysis, and drafting, but cannot independently drive the scientific reasoning and coordination required for professional-level astronomical collaboration. (capable: Large language model (e.g., GPT‑4, Claude) for research assistance)

0 capabilities · 1 occupations

Basis

How exposure was assessed

[v4/median] score 22 (raw 22 | A 25 / B 22 / C 15 | modality: other) AI can assist with literature searches, data analysis, and drafting, but cannot independently drive the scientific reasoning and coordination required for professional-level astronomical collaboration. (capable: Large language model (e.g., GPT‑4, Claude) for research assistance)

Automation exposure22/100

How much of this task's output current AI can produce or substantially assist.

Strongest applicable capability0/100

Best current model strength on any capability this task requires.

This is an assessment of technical feasibility plus published evidence - not a forecast. Even fully automatable tasks are often not automated, because of cost, verification, liability, regulation or the fact that the task is bundled with other work.

Occupations

Occupations that perform this task (1)

Importance is the O*NET-style weight of this task within each occupation. The same task can be highly exposed but peripheral to one job and core to another.

Occupations performing Collaborate with other astronomers to carry out research projects., with task importance and exposure.
OccupationIndustryImportanceRoleOccupation AI exposure
AstronomersCross-industry4.4/5core10

Evidence

Evidence (0)

No evidence item is mapped to this specific task yet. The exposure figure above rests on the v1 editorial baseline and on the capability assessment, and should be treated as low-confidence. Pages with fewer than 0 evidence items are excluded from sitemaps.