Skip to main content
A/KAI Kills What?

Task // O*NET task

Very high exposure · 1 occupations · 0 evidence

Calculate latitudes, longitudes, angles, areas, or other information for mapmaking, using survey field notes or referen…

Calculate latitudes, longitudes, angles, areas, or other information for mapmaking, using survey field notes or reference tables.

Task automation exposure

95/100

Very high exposure

Exposure basis

[v4/median] score 95 (raw 95 | A 95 / B 70 / C 95 | modality: other) AI-enabled GIS software can compute latitudes, longitudes, angles, and areas from field notes or reference tables at professional quality. (capable: ArcGIS Pro)

0 capabilities · 1 occupations

Basis

How exposure was assessed

[v4/median] score 95 (raw 95 | A 95 / B 70 / C 95 | modality: other) AI-enabled GIS software can compute latitudes, longitudes, angles, and areas from field notes or reference tables at professional quality. (capable: ArcGIS Pro)

Automation exposure95/100

How much of this task's output current AI can produce or substantially assist.

Strongest applicable capability0/100

Best current model strength on any capability this task requires.

This is an assessment of technical feasibility plus published evidence - not a forecast. Even fully automatable tasks are often not automated, because of cost, verification, liability, regulation or the fact that the task is bundled with other work.

Occupations

Occupations that perform this task (1)

Importance is the O*NET-style weight of this task within each occupation. The same task can be highly exposed but peripheral to one job and core to another.

Occupations performing Calculate latitudes, longitudes, angles, areas, or other information for mapmaking, using survey field notes or referen…, with task importance and exposure.
OccupationIndustryImportanceRoleOccupation AI exposure
Surveying and Mapping TechniciansCross-industry4.2/5core12

Evidence

Evidence (0)

No evidence item is mapped to this specific task yet. The exposure figure above rests on the v1 editorial baseline and on the capability assessment, and should be treated as low-confidence. Pages with fewer than 0 evidence items are excluded from sitemaps.