Skip to main content
A/KAI Kills What?

Task // O*NET task

Low exposure · 1 occupations · 0 evidence

Contribute written material or data for grant or patent applications.

Contribute written material or data for grant or patent applications.

Task automation exposure

30/100

Low exposure

Exposure basis

[v4/median] score 30 (raw 30 | A 65 / B 30 / C 30 | modality: other) Current LLMs can draft technical text, summarize data, and format grant/patent sections at professional quality, but still require expert oversight for novelty and legal precision. (capable: Large Language Model (e.g., GPT‑4 or similar))

0 capabilities · 1 occupations

Basis

How exposure was assessed

[v4/median] score 30 (raw 30 | A 65 / B 30 / C 30 | modality: other) Current LLMs can draft technical text, summarize data, and format grant/patent sections at professional quality, but still require expert oversight for novelty and legal precision. (capable: Large Language Model (e.g., GPT‑4 or similar))

Automation exposure30/100

How much of this task's output current AI can produce or substantially assist.

Strongest applicable capability0/100

Best current model strength on any capability this task requires.

This is an assessment of technical feasibility plus published evidence - not a forecast. Even fully automatable tasks are often not automated, because of cost, verification, liability, regulation or the fact that the task is bundled with other work.

Occupations

Occupations that perform this task (1)

Importance is the O*NET-style weight of this task within each occupation. The same task can be highly exposed but peripheral to one job and core to another.

Occupations performing Contribute written material or data for grant or patent applications., with task importance and exposure.
OccupationIndustryImportanceRoleOccupation AI exposure
Nanotechnology Engineering Technologists and TechniciansCross-industry3.5/5core9

Evidence

Evidence (0)

No evidence item is mapped to this specific task yet. The exposure figure above rests on the v1 editorial baseline and on the capability assessment, and should be treated as low-confidence. Pages with fewer than 0 evidence items are excluded from sitemaps.