Skip to main content
A/KAI Kills What?

Task // O*NET task

Very high exposure · 1 occupations · 0 evidence

Perform security analyses of developed or packaged software components.

Perform security analyses of developed or packaged software components.

Task automation exposure

85/100

Very high exposure

Exposure basis

[v4/median] score 85 (raw 85 | A 85 / B 85 / C 85 | modality: other) Static application security testing (SAST) and dynamic analysis tools are standard, widely deployed, and highly effective at identifying vulnerabilities in code, though they still require human interpretation for complex logic flaws and false-positive triage. (capable: SAST/DAST tools (e.g., SonarQube, Checkmarx, OWASP ZAP))

0 capabilities · 1 occupations

Basis

How exposure was assessed

[v4/median] score 85 (raw 85 | A 85 / B 85 / C 85 | modality: other) Static application security testing (SAST) and dynamic analysis tools are standard, widely deployed, and highly effective at identifying vulnerabilities in code, though they still require human interpretation for complex logic flaws and false-positive triage. (capable: SAST/DAST tools (e.g., SonarQube, Checkmarx, OWASP ZAP))

Automation exposure85/100

How much of this task's output current AI can produce or substantially assist.

Strongest applicable capability0/100

Best current model strength on any capability this task requires.

This is an assessment of technical feasibility plus published evidence - not a forecast. Even fully automatable tasks are often not automated, because of cost, verification, liability, regulation or the fact that the task is bundled with other work.

Occupations

Occupations that perform this task (1)

Importance is the O*NET-style weight of this task within each occupation. The same task can be highly exposed but peripheral to one job and core to another.

Occupations performing Perform security analyses of developed or packaged software components., with task importance and exposure.
OccupationIndustryImportanceRoleOccupation AI exposure
Computer Systems Engineers/ArchitectsCross-industry3.7/5core-

Evidence

Evidence (0)

No evidence item is mapped to this specific task yet. The exposure figure above rests on the v1 editorial baseline and on the capability assessment, and should be treated as low-confidence. Pages with fewer than 0 evidence items are excluded from sitemaps.