Skip to main content
A/KAI Kills What?

Task // O*NET task

High exposure · 1 occupations · 0 evidence

Develop or direct software system testing or validation procedures, programming, or documentation.

Develop or direct software system testing or validation procedures, programming, or documentation.

Task automation exposure

75/100

High exposure

Exposure basis

[v4/median] score 75 (raw 75 | A 80 / B 75 / C 30 | modality: other) Current AI can generate high‑quality code, test suites and documentation, though occasional human refinement is still typical (capable: Large language model (e.g., GPT‑4/Claude) with code generation capabilities)

0 capabilities · 1 occupations

Basis

How exposure was assessed

[v4/median] score 75 (raw 75 | A 80 / B 75 / C 30 | modality: other) Current AI can generate high‑quality code, test suites and documentation, though occasional human refinement is still typical (capable: Large language model (e.g., GPT‑4/Claude) with code generation capabilities)

Automation exposure75/100

How much of this task's output current AI can produce or substantially assist.

Strongest applicable capability0/100

Best current model strength on any capability this task requires.

This is an assessment of technical feasibility plus published evidence - not a forecast. Even fully automatable tasks are often not automated, because of cost, verification, liability, regulation or the fact that the task is bundled with other work.

Occupations

Occupations that perform this task (1)

Importance is the O*NET-style weight of this task within each occupation. The same task can be highly exposed but peripheral to one job and core to another.

Occupations performing Develop or direct software system testing or validation procedures, programming, or documentation., with task importance and exposure.
OccupationIndustryImportanceRoleOccupation AI exposure
Software DevelopersSoftware & technology3.9/5core35

Evidence

Evidence (0)

No evidence item is mapped to this specific task yet. The exposure figure above rests on the v1 editorial baseline and on the capability assessment, and should be treated as low-confidence. Pages with fewer than 0 evidence items are excluded from sitemaps.