Prepare detailed workflow charts and diagrams that describe input, output, and logical operation, and convert them into…
Prepare detailed workflow charts and diagrams that describe input, output, and logical operation, and convert them into a series of instructions coded in a computer language.
Task automation exposure
High exposure
Exposure basis
[v4/median] score 75 (raw 75 | A 75 / B 85 / C 30 | modality: other) Current LLMs and AI code assistants can reliably generate detailed flowcharts/diagrams (e.g., via Mermaid/PlantUML) and translate them into professional-quality code, though occasional human refinement may still be preferred. (capable: Large Language Model (e.g., GPT‑4o, Claude 3.5) with code‑assistant integrations)
0 capabilities · 1 occupations
Basis
How exposure was assessed
[v4/median] score 75 (raw 75 | A 75 / B 85 / C 30 | modality: other) Current LLMs and AI code assistants can reliably generate detailed flowcharts/diagrams (e.g., via Mermaid/PlantUML) and translate them into professional-quality code, though occasional human refinement may still be preferred. (capable: Large Language Model (e.g., GPT‑4o, Claude 3.5) with code‑assistant integrations)
How much of this task's output current AI can produce or substantially assist.
Best current model strength on any capability this task requires.
This is an assessment of technical feasibility plus published evidence - not a forecast. Even fully automatable tasks are often not automated, because of cost, verification, liability, regulation or the fact that the task is bundled with other work.
Occupations
Occupations that perform this task (1)
Importance is the O*NET-style weight of this task within each occupation. The same task can be highly exposed but peripheral to one job and core to another.
| Occupation | Industry | Importance | Role | Occupation AI exposure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Computer Programmers | Software & technology | 3.6/5 | core | 22 |
Evidence
Evidence (0)
No evidence item is mapped to this specific task yet. The exposure figure above rests on the v1 editorial baseline and on the capability assessment, and should be treated as low-confidence. Pages with fewer than 0 evidence items are excluded from sitemaps.