Skip to main content
A/KAI Kills What?

Task // Text production

High exposure · 3 occupations · 0 evidence

Drafting reports and memos

Producing structured written documents from notes, data or briefs.

Task automation exposure

70/100

High exposure

Exposure basis

[v4/median] score 70 (raw 70 | A 70 / B 85 / C 35 | modality: other) Current LLMs can turn notes and data into well‑structured drafts comparable to professional drafts, though expert review is still needed for deep insight and accuracy. (capable: Large Language Model (e.g., GPT‑4 or Claude))

2 capabilities · 3 occupations

Basis

How exposure was assessed

[v4/median] score 70 (raw 70 | A 70 / B 85 / C 35 | modality: other) Current LLMs can turn notes and data into well‑structured drafts comparable to professional drafts, though expert review is still needed for deep insight and accuracy. (capable: Large Language Model (e.g., GPT‑4 or Claude))

Automation exposure70/100

How much of this task's output current AI can produce or substantially assist.

Strongest applicable capability88/100

Best current model strength on any capability this task requires.

This is an assessment of technical feasibility plus published evidence - not a forecast. Even fully automatable tasks are often not automated, because of cost, verification, liability, regulation or the fact that the task is bundled with other work.

Capabilities

AI capabilities involved

Occupations

Occupations that perform this task (3)

Importance is the O*NET-style weight of this task within each occupation. The same task can be highly exposed but peripheral to one job and core to another.

Occupations performing Drafting reports and memos, with task importance and exposure.
OccupationIndustryImportanceRoleOccupation AI exposure
Research ScientistsScience & research4/5core49
Elementary and Secondary School TeachersEducation3/5secondary34
Therapists and CounsellorsHealthcare3/5secondary35

Evidence

Evidence (0)

No evidence item is mapped to this specific task yet. The exposure figure above rests on the v1 editorial baseline and on the capability assessment, and should be treated as low-confidence. Pages with fewer than 0 evidence items are excluded from sitemaps.